In the year 2K16, it’s understood that the bar is high for white writers who choose to tell these stories.

I was expecting to write a review covering multiple points that are generally made in these conversations; by the end, I was just angry.

This makes for an implicit metatextual argument for historical fiction/biography as a whole: you have to conjure one world into the reality of another, and to do so isn't so much about researching and relaying the facts as it is allowing them to calcinate in the imagination.

Mamatas's close relationship to San Francisco and the Bay Area feeds into his descriptions of the city and into the adventures and anecdotes shared by the characters, showing us how we're surrounded by stories and also exchanging stories with our fellow human beings on a daily basis.

Each queer union is as hopeless as its heterosexual and straight counterparts.

There is neither judgement nor condemnation, yet at the same time there is an equal lack of celebration or hopefulness. As such, these pieces are necessarily impressionistic and often dreamlike, sacrificing character and plot in favor of style and feeling.

Before the era of top ten listicles, marketing labels and the best-of-genre trailers, these films were seen and circulated within the cinephile world as examples of "great (art) films," not "great science fiction films."What apocalypse stories tend to share is a theme of faith: what it is to have it, what it is to lose it, and how the object of that faith is both constructed and reconstructed in a changing environment.

The first book enchanted with under-explored glimpses of otter islands and hints of Earth origins; this volume continues to offer glimmers of recognition coupled with enough strangeness and unanswered questions to keep readers invested.Hopkinson's stories are very much about finding one’s place in the world, about battling hierarchies and systems of oppression, and about empowerment.Female readers need voices like hers, LGBT readers need voices like hers, and so does the genre of Weird fiction.Liu is an outstanding writer, this book is excellent, and when future generations look to exemplify the zeitgeist of early twenty-first century speculative fiction this will be one of the first volumes to which they turn.However, my blood's up so let's get back to those metaphors. Both Danielewski's fans do and his professional critics consider his work as a particularly intricate key with eyes toward a potential lock; the frame, instead, allows us to situate it on a keyring, and go from there.